Friday, August 31, 2007

Missions, cultural influence, and the Bible

The latest edition of Scientific American Mind describes new research that points out the powerful and frequently hidden influence that culture has on the way our brains perceive the world around us. The study of culture and cross-cultural communication/interaction, especially as it relates to missions, is a topic I have long been interested in.

Certainly it's nothing new to learn that culture impacts the way we interact with the people around us, but I have been thinking more on this topic lately with a new book that I recently finished, recommended to me, titled "Postmission." The book is a collection of essays written by Gen-Xers who are leaders in various mission organizations. And, through their essays, the book attempts to provide a vision or perspective of what missions could look like in a postmodern world.

It's the central premise of the book that I find so interesting, and compelling at times, even if I'm not sold completely on their perspective. But, the central premise of the book is that missions today has been heavily influenced by Modernism and that many of the "classic" values (even central tenets) of missions today are more cultural than Biblical. This certainly is not the first book on the subject, but it's the first that I have read specifically authored by Xers, and it's the first I have read to cast such a wide culturally-influenced net over missions. (Not a great sentence, but hoping you understand it). The book also spends many pages describing the differences between Gen-Xers, Boomers, etc, and how the two can learn to work better with each other, specifically in the context of missions--there are some helpful and very practical examples.

Overall, the book is a useful read, although my one negative critique of it is that the authors tend to focus heavily on the positive aspects that Postmodernism can lend to missions and conversely, a negative outlook on what Modernism has done for missions. They do not provide much of a balanced and thoughtful response on the strengths and weaknesses of the two and their contributions and limitations to missions-thinking.

Nonetheless, asking how Modernism has affected missions is a valid and intriguing question. A few observations made by the authors (actually, points they take from other missiologists, but find compelling to what they are also arguing):

"Reason supplanted faith as a beginning point for Christians and for missionaries."

"Christians came to believe that all problems were solvable, pushing God to the margin."

"Missionary outlook and practice has become infused with rationalism--pragmatic thinking...and reasoning through which methods and techniques have come to drive mission theology and strategy."

"The church and mission became captive to the philosophy of progress--to the idea of the imminent global triumph of Christianity."

Most people would agree that our own culture affects the way we interact with others, but that fact takes on a whole new, deeper, and personal meaning when I begin to more closely examine how what I think and how I think has been affected by Modernism and by the culture in which I live. The book even describes that how I understand and interpret the Bible is affected by my culture (read "Honor and Shame" by Roland Muller for an excellent and more academic treatment of that subject--a book I highly recommend), which I, in the past several years, have only begun to consider.

I'm not sure the best way to end this. I suppose I simply wanted to write these thoughts down because, as one who has been and remains personally involved in missions work, they are things that intrigue and challenge me. The more I consider it, the more I realize how my cultures (the secular American culture and the Christian culture) affect, even in nearly imperceptible ways, how I view and think about the world around me. Yet, those nearly invisible influences can have a profound affect on my own faith, on my ability to connect with others, and on the lives and faith of those I meet.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Getting lost and then....well....

huhh????



We passed this church cemetery as we were lost one recent weekend looking for a library in our new town and we did a double-take. Seems like a fairly stern warning....

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Is Diversity Worth It?

In case you have not yet heard the latest about Harvard professor and noted political scientist Robert Putnam, his newest research on diversity is not optimistic. I have not actually read the study, but here is how the Wall Street Journal reports it today....
----------
"Now comes word that diversity as an ideology may be dead, or not worth saving. Robert Putnam, the Harvard don who in the controversial bestseller "Bowling Alone" announced the decline of communal-mindedness amid the rise of home-alone couch potatoes, has completed a mammoth study of the effects of ethnic diversity on communities. His researchers did 30,000 interviews in 41 U.S. communities. Short version: People in ethnically diverse settings don't want to have much of anything to do with each other. "Social capital" erodes. Diversity has a downside.

Prof. Putnam isn't exactly hiding these volatile conclusions, though he did introduce them in a journal called Scandinavian Political Studies. A great believer in the efficacy of what social scientists call "reciprocity," he wasn't happy with what he found but didn't mince words describing the results:

"Inhabitants of diverse communities tend to withdraw from collective life, to distrust their neighbors, regardless of the color of their skin, to withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more, but have less faith that they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television." The diversity nightmare gets worse: They have little confidence in the "local news media." This after all we've done for them.

Colleagues and diversity advocates, disturbed at what was emerging from the study, suggested alternative explanations. Prof. Putnam and his team re-ran the data every which way from Sunday and the result was always the same: Diverse communities may be yeasty and even creative, but trust, altruism and community cooperation fall. He calls it "hunkering down."
----------
(that was only a short excerpt, but you can see a similar story here: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c4ac4a74-570f-11db-9110-0000779e2340.html (as of 8/16/07)

The finding are really not all that surprising--human nature is to want to be with those who are similar to us. We want to stay in our comfort zones. Getting to know the person down the street who looks different or talks different or lives differently is not easy, is not comfortable, and is sometimes not even very popular. But God knows (I don't mean that lightly) that sometimes we are not our very best until we live differently, until we go against the flow, until we do what feels at first strange.

Perhaps it is up to us, those with a Biblical faith, to show the world that diversity in community is possible, is needed, and is even essential. It's clear that it won't be easy, but ease is not what we are called to.

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

Many months, many changes....

I have decided to pick this up again after 7 months....2,600 miles, new state, new culture, new job, new church, new climate....

There have been a lot of changes in my family's life since I last wrote, but we are doing well. We are learning to make the South our home. We sure miss the Northwest and our friends and church there, but God has shown us, on more than one occasion, that this has been the right move for us.

One of the tougher aspects of the move has been getting to know people...

If you have ever walking into a church and walked back out (for 5 weeks) without having one person say something other that a quick "hello" to you, I understand how you feel. We think we may have found a church, and after 5 weeks there is a lot we like. But, it bothers me that, after 5 weeks, we still have not had anyone ask if we are new or strike up a conversation. We've been thinking we may just need to be the initiators. But, something about that bothers me. It bothers me that there may have been people sitting just behind or to my side in my previous church that I did not take the time to stop and take an interest in. Whether it's right or not, having friends at church and feeling like people there care about me/my family is important. We hope to meet someone at this church soon. And, I hope to not ever forget these first few weeks, and to make sure I take a personal interest in the "strangers" I see around me at church in the future.

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Inspired through advent and Christmas

I tend to like well-written summary statements that, although short, pack a lot of meaning. And I've been thinking about such a statement on the meaning of Christmas and this advent season. However, after spending some weeks thinking on the topic and reading scripture, I'm realizing that this season just can't be easily defined by one sentence.

Advent is a time both for thinking about the birth of Jesus and for thinking about his second coming. Here are the points that have struck me the greatest these past several weeks as I have reflected on different readings from the Bible:

-Christmas brings us Jesus, God in personal human form. While certainly there is a "Holy otherness" to God, Christmas reminds me of the surprisingly personal nature of God.

-Christmas reminds me that Jesus' life, from birth to death, was countercultural. Different from the secular culture in which he lived...."the greatest should be like the yougest," "the one who rules like the one who serves." His life was also counter to what the religious culture expected.

-Christmas reminds me that truth is real and that truth matters. And it also reminds me that truth is less about outward appearances and more about the heart.

-Christmas reminds me to live intentionally. I need to use my gifts and talents wisely.

-Christmas reminds me of hope. Even amid blatant wrong, a future hope is certain.

personal
countercultural
truth-grounded
intentional
hopeful

These are the faith-characteristics I am reminded of, challenged with, and inspired by this advent season.

Saturday, December 2, 2006

Advent

Advent begins tomorrow, historically also marking the beginning of the Christian calendar year.

Although the Church remembered Christ's birth and life in the weeks preceding Christmas early-on, Pope Gregory the Great (540-604) is often recognized as formally instituting advent. A former monk and ascetic, he influenced the direction of the Church in significant ways during a time when it was wrestling with how to remain an influence in society without becoming indistinguishably part of it.

So, why does my family practice advent?
  • It reminds us that Christmas is more significant than the cultural hype surrounding it.
  • It provides a richness and context to the season as we read verses from the Bible in preparation for Christmas.
  • It connects us with a centuries-old Christian tradition that many before us have practiced.

This time of year, there are some decisions that don't matter much: will it be a fake tree or real? PS3 or X Box? Ipod or Zune? Wii? Turkey or ham?

The decision, however, to make this season more than just about presents and santa does matter. So, what is Christmas about? My personal challenge is, over these next four weeks, to reflect on that question.

It seems there are few things that could matter more.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

"Radical" faith

Is "radical" bad?

Many people, from my good friend at work, to others like Sam Harris decry "radicals" from any faith or religion. If you have not read it or heard it yet, you will. Muslims and evangelicals are frequently lumped together in these discussions. Take this real quote as an example, "the rabid elements of both christianity and islam aim to conquer and convert the planet."

And, when people talk like this--when they refer to "rabid elements," "radical christians," or "fanatics"--those terms are frequently (though certainly not always) describing what most people in search of a Biblical faith would agree with. My friend from work, and many others like him, if not anti-faith, seem to think that a faith in God that allows people to continue living the way they please is best. "Have your faith, but please don't bother me with it or question how I live," is a phrase that i can imagine my friend saying.

Is this person correct? "Best dialogues seem to be about how to make a tasty apple pie, or the best way to re-roof the porch. Vital but not world shattering." I want to say, "no way!"

In a very real sense, the best dialogues ARE world shattering. But, do I want to come across as a "fanatic"? Do I want to be, as Voice of the Martyrs proudly prints, a "Jesus Freak"?

Most certainly yes. And most certainly no.