In case you have not yet heard the latest about Harvard professor and noted political scientist Robert Putnam, his newest research on diversity is not optimistic. I have not actually read the study, but here is how the Wall Street Journal reports it today....
----------
"Now comes word that diversity as an ideology may be dead, or not worth saving. Robert Putnam, the Harvard don who in the controversial bestseller "Bowling Alone" announced the decline of communal-mindedness amid the rise of home-alone couch potatoes, has completed a mammoth study of the effects of ethnic diversity on communities. His researchers did 30,000 interviews in 41 U.S. communities. Short version: People in ethnically diverse settings don't want to have much of anything to do with each other. "Social capital" erodes. Diversity has a downside.
Prof. Putnam isn't exactly hiding these volatile conclusions, though he did introduce them in a journal called Scandinavian Political Studies. A great believer in the efficacy of what social scientists call "reciprocity," he wasn't happy with what he found but didn't mince words describing the results:
"Inhabitants of diverse communities tend to withdraw from collective life, to distrust their neighbors, regardless of the color of their skin, to withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more, but have less faith that they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television." The diversity nightmare gets worse: They have little confidence in the "local news media." This after all we've done for them.
Colleagues and diversity advocates, disturbed at what was emerging from the study, suggested alternative explanations. Prof. Putnam and his team re-ran the data every which way from Sunday and the result was always the same: Diverse communities may be yeasty and even creative, but trust, altruism and community cooperation fall. He calls it "hunkering down."
----------
(that was only a short excerpt, but you can see a similar story here: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c4ac4a74-570f-11db-9110-0000779e2340.html (as of 8/16/07)
The finding are really not all that surprising--human nature is to want to be with those who are similar to us. We want to stay in our comfort zones. Getting to know the person down the street who looks different or talks different or lives differently is not easy, is not comfortable, and is sometimes not even very popular. But God knows (I don't mean that lightly) that sometimes we are not our very best until we live differently, until we go against the flow, until we do what feels at first strange.
Perhaps it is up to us, those with a Biblical faith, to show the world that diversity in community is possible, is needed, and is even essential. It's clear that it won't be easy, but ease is not what we are called to.
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Nathan,
I agree with you. People tend toward a lot of things that aren't necessarily best. I think we call that sin. It's interesting, though, that somewhere deep down - most people feel that ethnic diversity is right. This, of course doesn't include those who are so focused on self that they will see Putnam's report as validation for their selfishness.
I'm reading a book right now called "Embracing Grace" by Scot McKnight. His premise is that God created us for union with Himself and communion with others; even those who are different from us. The Gospel, he says, is that this kind of community can and does exist in the church.
His belief is that this kind of community can only happen in Christ. Without Him, we will continue to fail at it. Perhaps that's what's missing from Professor Putnam's report.
Thanks Dean, I agree with you. And, I think you are right, that we will fail at this without Him.
dean, scot mcknight is one of my fav authors these days. i read his blog and have read "jesus creed" - "grace" is on my list.
as i read this, i caught myself feeling overwhelmed. i felt tired, thinking of how impossible it seems to change a current in church culture, in particular this tendency to gather with those like us. over the last year or so, i've been thinking a lot about how we do church and how to change the broken parts and felt the same overwhelming weariness. the conclusion i'm coming to (it's not mine, but that of the more learned folks out there) is that it comes down to me, to individuals who walk together as they walk with Jesus, paying attention to everyone they meet around them, paying attention to the walls we have within us (and walking through them), living out of and with Jesus as we go. then that kind of life will then start to infect others, which in turn might start affecting current church culture. what do you think?
Nathan
Diversity is- again (like the issues with: worship styles, church programming, ministry organizations, etc...) peripheral to the central issue - relationships.
I have always thought it interesting to note that most ethnic diversity was 'created' (Genesis through...) out of relational sin.
A. Tower of Babel - scattered.
B. Flood then Ham/Shem Japheth sinned against Noah- scattered.
C. Israel/Juddah - divided
D. Abraham didn't conquest correctly -
E. Moses/Arron struggled through desert and tried to enter without treaty -
F. David/Bathsheba- and his kids couldn't get along
Not great theology - just sad.
One in Him
bg
Post a Comment