Tuesday, November 28, 2006

"Radical" faith

Is "radical" bad?

Many people, from my good friend at work, to others like Sam Harris decry "radicals" from any faith or religion. If you have not read it or heard it yet, you will. Muslims and evangelicals are frequently lumped together in these discussions. Take this real quote as an example, "the rabid elements of both christianity and islam aim to conquer and convert the planet."

And, when people talk like this--when they refer to "rabid elements," "radical christians," or "fanatics"--those terms are frequently (though certainly not always) describing what most people in search of a Biblical faith would agree with. My friend from work, and many others like him, if not anti-faith, seem to think that a faith in God that allows people to continue living the way they please is best. "Have your faith, but please don't bother me with it or question how I live," is a phrase that i can imagine my friend saying.

Is this person correct? "Best dialogues seem to be about how to make a tasty apple pie, or the best way to re-roof the porch. Vital but not world shattering." I want to say, "no way!"

In a very real sense, the best dialogues ARE world shattering. But, do I want to come across as a "fanatic"? Do I want to be, as Voice of the Martyrs proudly prints, a "Jesus Freak"?

Most certainly yes. And most certainly no.

1 comment:

Brad said...

Freak.

And yes, that's a compliment. For the radicalism you live is not a matter of the public square rather the heart (radically transformed).

So, is the "heart" a postmodern metaphor for the icon "the public square?" Is this the generation that would exchange good for what is easy?

Blessing
bg